Decoding the Trademark Registration Process in India: A Legal and Practical Analysis

Kashish Chauhan

In India, the legal regime governing trademarks has evolved significantly, offering a comprehensive framework under the Trademarks Act, 1999 and its accompanying rules. This article presents a detailed legal and procedural overview of the trademark registration process in India, highlighting each stage from application to opposition and final registration. It also critically examines the challenges faced by small brand owners, particularly those seeking to register unconventional trademarks, due to widespread unawareness and systemic complexity which has become a matter of concern for such small brand owners. The article will also identify gaps between legal provisions and practical implementation, drawing attention to the need for increased accessibility, procedural reform, and institutional support.

Introduction

Trademarks are vital instruments for protecting brand identity and promoting commercial value in a competitive economy. In today’s word Trademarks serve more than just as a symbol of identification but also do provide insights on the goodwill, commercial reputation of the company or person holding such trademark. The concept of Trademark has evolved significantly and is still going on. The Trademarks Act, 1999 deals and provides a legal framework for dealing with trademarks in India. Trademark in its simplest sense means the right granted by the government to any person to use is mark freely from violation or use by any other person. It helps in business facilitation and also in distinguishing the mark so registered from any other marks. 

Despite this robust legal architecture, the practical experience of obtaining a trademark registration can be riddled with procedural complexity, delays, and inconsistent application of rules. This article undertakes an in-depth examination of the trademark registration process in India, delving into its legal underpinnings, procedural stages, challenges, and potential reforms.

Legal Framework Governing Trademarks in India and grounds for refusal

The governing statute for trademark protection in India is the Trademarks Act, 1999, read in conjunction with the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. These laws govern all aspects of trademark registration, opposition, renewal, enforcement, and licensing. 

In the case of Dau Dayal v. State of Uttar Pradesh it was held that the goal of the act is to protect and safeguard the rights of the individual who produces and sells distinctive items against infringement by third party.

The act defines trademark under Section 2(zb) which is any mark which is capable of being represented graphically and capable of distinguishing goods or services of one person from another. The section has made the ambit of trademark quite wide in its sense by including marks which indicate relation between the goods or services used in the course of trade and any person having right as proprietor and registered user to use that mark. Further the act provides two types of grounds for the refusal to register a trademark which are absolute and relative in nature.

Section 9 of the act provides absolute grounds for refusal to register a trademark which are-

  1. Devoid of distinctive character 
  2. Any trademark that consists exclusively of marks that indicate kind, nature, quality
  3. Which consists of marks that have become customary to the current language or bona fide practices of trade 

The section also provides certain other grounds like any mark that causes confusion to public, which contains obscene matter, hurts religious sentiments and any other mark that consists exclusively of shape of goods to give technical nature, to obtain substantial value and that results from the shape of goods.

In the case of Milmet oftho Industries et al v. Allergen Inc. the Supreme Court barred an Indian firm to use OCUFLOX as trade name. The court held that even though the name was not used or registered in India, the opposition was the first to enter into the global market.

Section 11 on the other hand states and talks about the relative grounds for the refusal of registration of trademarks which are- 

  1. The mark is identical to, or due to its identity with other mark
  2. Mark is similar to, or due to its identity or similarity with other mark

Causes confusion to public of likelihood of association.

The act further lays down certain other grounds like identical or similar to a well-known trademark and dealing with goods and services other than that for which it was registered. The section further mentions marks that are to be protected by the virtue of passing off and by the copyright act. When the mark is said to be different from a well-known trademark the Registrar shall further the application process and protect the well-known trademark. 

The Trademark Registration Process in India

The process of trademark registration in India is governed primarily by Sections 18 to 23 of the Trademarks Act and the relevant Rules. It comprises several distinct stages:

1. Trademark search

Before filing a trademark application, it is advisable to conduct a thorough search on the IP India website. This helps identify existing or similar trademarks and assess the registrability of the proposed mark. While optional, this step can save applicants time and costs by avoiding likely objections or oppositions.

2. Application for registration

The application for registration is given under Section 18 and may be filed individually or jointly and may include single-class or multi-class applications. The application is required to be filed in the office of Trademark Registry within whose local limits the principal place of business is situate. The Registrar after receiving the application may grant, reject, accept subject to conditions or amendments.

3. Examination and Advertisement

On receiving the application and after grant of acceptance the Registrar may still withdraw the acceptance under Section 19 if he is of the view that the acceptance was made in error or the application should not be accepted or be accepted subject to some other conditions. 

After such acceptance the Registrar shall require the application to be advertised under Section 20 and if application is advertised before acceptance or needs some amendment then he may require the application to be re-advertised after correction of error.

4. Opposition proceedings 

This section lays down the rule that any person claiming shall file an opposition within four months of the advertisement, copy of which should be sent to the applicant and who shall then file a counterstatement in response. Grounds for opposition include prior use, similarity, bad faith, or any other statutory reason. Further the Registrar shall hear both the parties and decide upon the question of objection and then decide. 

5. Registration and Issuance of certificate 

If no opposition is filed or the opposition is decided in favour of the applicant, the Registrar proceeds to register the trademark and issues a registration certificate. The registration is valid for 10 years from the date of application and can be renewed indefinitely in 10-year increments by paying the prescribed fee.

Challenges faced by small brand owners due to unawareness while applying for Unconventional trademarks

Unconventional trademarks refer to non-traditional marks such as sounds, smells, shapes, motion, and colour combinations that are not immediately perceived as traditional word or logo marks. Although the Trademarks Act, 1999 allows for their registration, the process remains daunting for small brand owners due to multiple challenges:

  1. Lack of Awareness about Eligibility

Many small brand owners are unaware that non-traditional elements of their branding—such as a specific jingle, packaging shape, or color combination—may qualify for trademark protection. Due to this lack of knowledge, they often miss the opportunity to safeguard their unique identifiers, leaving them vulnerable to imitation.

  1. Difficulty in Graphical Representation

A major requirement under Indian trademark law is that the mark must be capable of being graphically represented. This becomes challenging for unconventional marks such as smells or holograms. Small businesses, lacking legal expertise or access to specialized services, struggle to meet this criterion effectively.

  1. Procedural Complexity

The process of registering unconventional trademarks involves additional documentation, expert verification, and precise articulation of the mark’s uniqueness. For small brand owners, navigating this complex process without legal counsel becomes a formidable task.

  1. High Costs of Registration and Maintenance

Small brand owners often operate under tight budgets. The costs associated with registering and defending unconventional trademarks—such as expert reports, legal consultations, and prolonged correspondence with the Trademark Registry—can be prohibitively expensive.

  1. Limited Precedents and Guidance

Unlike traditional trademarks, there are limited successful registrations of unconventional trademarks in India. The absence of a robust database of case studies or guidance materials makes it difficult for small applicants to evaluate their chances or prepare effectively.

  1. Institutional Limitations

Trademark examiners and legal practitioners themselves may not be uniformly trained or experienced in evaluating unconventional marks. This leads to unpredictability and prolonged examination periods, which can deter small businesses from pursuing such registrations.

Recommendations and Reforms

  1. Specialized Examination Units
    Establish dedicated teams within the Trademark Registry for assessing unconventional marks with required training in sensory-based and non-visual identifiers.
  2. Simplified Filing Guidelines
    Issue detailed manuals and sample formats specifically for unconventional trademark applications (e.g., how to graphically represent a sound or smell).
  3. Fast-Track Review for MSMEs
    Introduce a lower-fee, expedited track for MSMEs, with reduced documentation requirements and quicker processing timelines.
  4. Public Awareness Campaigns
    Government and IP authorities should launch campaigns across Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities educating small businesses about IP rights, with specific focus on non-traditional marks.
  5. Government IP Subsidy Schemes
    Provide reimbursement for a percentage of registration costs incurred by small businesses, especially those filing for unconventional trademarks.

Conclusion

Trademark registration is the foundation of brand protection and business development in India. The statutory provisions under the Trademarks Act, 1999 offer a comprehensive foundation for this process. However, the real-world experiences of applicants-small brand owners-fail to highlight the contradictions between the potential and practical consequences and the legal outcomes. The challenges by small businesses in protecting the unconventional trademark are more incorporated and underscoring the need for accessible IP ecosystems. Removing awareness distance, facilitating processing requirements, and empowering MSMEs through targeted support can unlike further participation in India’s Formal IP regime.

Moreover, strengthening the institutional capacity and streaming the processing structure will improve efficiency and legal certainty. India wants to be a global centre for innovation and entrepreneurship, ensuring that all businesses – regardless of size – can protect their constructive wealth is an economic essential and legal requirement. This article aims to contribute to a more uniform and effective trademark registration system in India by decoding the process, identifying obstacles, and advocating reforms – which not only respects the legal order, but also fulfils the aspirations of its various business community.

References

    1. The Trademarks Act, 1999 (as amended in 2012)
    2. Motion Picture Association. (2022). Piracy Impact Report: Asia-Pacific Region.
    3. Dau Dayal v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1959 AIR 433
    4. Milmet of tho Industries et al v. Allergen Inc 2004 AIR SCW 3174
    5. https://ipindia.gov.in/acts-rules-tm.htm
    6. https://ssrana.in/ip-laws/trademarks-in-india/trademarks-act-india/ 
    7. Sharma, M., & Singh, N. (2022). Trademark Registration: a study of the legal and technological challenges in applying for trademark in India. 
    8. https://www.iplink-asia.com/article-detail.php?id=1232

©2023. SatyakiLegal. All Rights Reserved.

Scroll to Top